Warn when review is needed
Surface the condition and allow the authorised person to respond where the configured control permits it.
Compliance Management
Build the roster with your operational rules in view.
Bring configured scheduling controls, staffing requirements and pay rules into the decisions your teams make. RASP shows what needs attention while there is still time to act, without hiding the reason from the operator.
Assignment check
North Terminal · Night shift
Warning
Rest between shifts
The proposed assignment triggers a configured scheduling condition.
Coverage gap
5 of 6 required
One Operations Controller position remains unfilled.
The scheduler sees the reason before deciding what to do next.
Review assignmentScheduling rules and warnings
Catch a scheduling issue before it becomes tomorrow's problem.
RASP's scheduling rules engine is a flexible rule builder that can use agreement, employee group, location, role, shift and work-pattern conditions. It helps teams apply organisation-defined policies and make workable scheduling decisions that align with their compliance requirements. Fatigue, rest, work-hour and consecutive-day controls are practical examples.
- Define the operating conditions that matter to your workforce
- Warn and ask for confirmation, prevent an assignment or request an employee self-assessment
- Apply the check while assessing candidates and assigning work
- Keep the triggered condition visible so the response can be understood
Configured scheduling controls
Assignment guardrails
Rest between shifts
WarnMaximum work hours
BlockConsecutive work days
ReviewMinimum staffing
Keep required staffing levels visible as the roster takes shape.
Define recurring coverage requirements by shift or time, location, team, role, skill and headcount. RASP compares those requirements with matching published assigned shifts, making planned shortfalls visible early enough for the roster manager to respond.
- See whether planned coverage is under, meeting or exceeding the requirement
- Find the location, role or skill behind a staffing gap
- Open an unmet requirement as a vacancy for assignment
- Use the coverage signal to support the decision without removing operator judgement
Minimum staffing
Night shift coverage
Required
6
Covered
5
To fill
1
Open the gap as a vacancy and continue filling the roster.
Clear outcomes
The rule should help the person making the decision.
A control has little value if it only produces a generic red flag. RASP keeps different concerns distinct and presents the configured response in the workflow, giving authorised users useful context for their next action.
Block an invalid assignment
Prevent the scheduling action when the configured outcome does not allow the assignment to continue.
Explain what happened
Show whether the concern relates to availability, qualifications, staffing or a scheduling rule.
From policy to practice
Your rules, visible in the work.
Carry configured outcomes into the connected workflow.
Scheduling is only one part of the workforce decision. Agreement-scoped pay rules can generate applicable pay items, allowances or claims from eligible work, helping the approved result continue into payroll with its rule context intact.
Rules remain part of the operating system.
Your organisation still owns its policies, obligations, configuration and authorised decisions. RASP helps apply the defined controls consistently in supported workflows.
Connected platform
Follow the control into the related workflow.
Request a demo
See how your operating rules fit the roster.
Bring a representative scheduling, staffing or pay rule. We will show how RASP makes the condition, response and next action visible in the workflow.